Download Content

• Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig
  In Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 56/64 - ETABLISSEMENTS CONSTEN SARL, having its registered office at Courbevoie (Seine), represented by J. Lassier, advocate at the Cour d'Appel, Paris, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of J. Welter, avocat-avoue, 6 rue Willy-Goergen, 58/64 -GRUNDIG-VERKAUFS-GMBH, having its registered office at Furth (Bavaria), represented…Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig
• Case 56/65 Societe Technique Miniere
  In Case 56/65 Reference to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Cour d'Appel (First Chamber), Paris, for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between SOCIETE TECHNIQUE MINIERE and MASCHINENBAU ULM GMBH on the interpretation of: 1. [Article 101(1) TFEU] and of certain regulations adopted in implementation thereof; 2. [Article…Case 56/65 Societe Technique Miniere
• Joined Cases 25-6/84 Ford v Commission
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 17 September 1985 In Joined Cases 25 and 26/84 (1) Ford-Werke AG, whose registered office is in Cologne (Federal Republic of Germany), applicant in Case 25/84, (2) Ford of Europe Inc., whose permanent address is in Wilmington, Delaware (United States), applicant in Case 26/84, both represented by J. Lever, Q. C.,…Joined Cases 25-6/84 Ford v Commission
• Case 42/84 Remia and Nutricia
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 11 July 1985 In Case 42/84 Remia BV, a private limited company having its registered office and place of business in the municipality of Den Dolder (Netherlands), F. A. de Rooij, its director, residing in the municipality of Den Dolder (Netherlands), and NV Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia, a public limited…Case 42/84 Remia and Nutricia
• Case 161/84 Pronuptia
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 28 January 1986 In Case 161/84 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice] for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Pronuptia de Paris GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, and Pronuptia de Paris Irmgard Schillgalis, Hamburg, on the interpretation of…Case 161/84 Pronuptia
• Case 234/89 Delimitis
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 28 February 1991 In Case C-234/89, REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Frankfurt am Main (Federal Republic of Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Stergios Delimitis and Henninger Bräu AG, on the interpretation of [Article…Case 234/89 Delimitis
• Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 April 1991 In Case C-41 /90, REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Oberlandesgericht München, Federal Republic of Germany, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser and Macrotron GmbH on the interpretation of [Articles 18,…Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser
• Joined Cases C-159-60/91 Poucet and Pistre
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 17 February 1993 In Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91, REFERENCES to the Court by the Tribunal des Affaires de Securite Sociale de l'Herault (France) for a preliminary ruling under [Article 267 TFEU] in the proceedings pending before that court between Christian Poucet and Assurances Générales de France (AGF) and Caisse Mutuelle…Joined Cases C-159-60/91 Poucet and Pistre
• Case T-112/99 Metropole Television
  JUDGMENT OF THE [GENERAL COURT] (Third Chamber) 18 September 2001 (Actions for annulment - Competition - Pay television - Joint venture - [Article 101 TFEU] - [Article 101(1) TFEU] - Negative clearance - Ancillary restrictions - Rule of reason - [Article 101(3) TFEU] - Exemption decision - Duration) In Case T-112/99, Métropole télévision (M6), established…Case T-112/99 Metropole Television