The Complete Cases

1 2 3 4 5 6 15
  • Case 196/85 Commission v France (Natural Sweet Wines) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 7 April 1987 In Case 196/85 Commission of the European [Union], represented by its Legal Adviser, Johannes Føns Buhl, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Georges Kremlis, a member of its Legal Department, Jean Monnet Building, Kirchberg, applicant, v French Republic, represented by…
  • Case 2/74 Reyners In Case 2/74 Reference to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Conseil d'Etat, Belgium for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between JEAN REYNERS, docteur en droit, company manager, resident at Woluwé­ Saint-Lambert (Brussels), and THE BELGIAN STATE, represented by its Minister of Justice, Intervening party: L'ORDRE NATIONAL DES…
  • Case 21-24/72 International Fruit In Joined Cases 21 to 24/72 Reference to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the College van Beroep voor bet Bedrijfsleven, The Hague, for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between INTERNATIONAL FRUIT COMPANY NV, Rotterdam (Case 21/72), KOOY ROTTERDAM NV, Rotterdam (Case 22/72), VELLEMAN EN TAS NV, Rotterdam (Case…
  • Case 22/70 Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities [1971] ECR 263 Case 22/70 Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities [1971] ECR 263 Facts: The Council had adopted a Resolution to coordinate negotiations for a European Road Transport Agreement. The Commission disapproved of the negotiating mechanism created and sought to challenge it Held: The Council’s proceedings were squarely within the power of…
  • Case 234/89 Delimitis JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 28 February 1991 In Case C-234/89, REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Frankfurt am Main (Federal Republic of Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Stergios Delimitis and Henninger Bräu AG, on the interpretation of [Article…
  • Case 24/68 Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy) In Case 24/68 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by Sandro Gaudenzi, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Emile Reuter, its Legal Adviser, 4 boulevard Royal, applicant, v ITALIAN REPUBLIC, represented by Adolfo Maresca, Minister Plenipotentiary acting as Agent, assisted by Pierro Peronaci, assistant to the Avvocato…
  • Case 246/80 Broekmeulen In Case 246/80 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Commissie van Beroep Huisartsgeneeskunde [Appeals Committee for General Medicine], The Hague, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that committee between C. BROEKMEULEN, a doctor practising at Kerkdriel, and HUISARTS REGISTRATIE COMMISSIE [General Practitioners Registration Committee], on the interpretation of…
  • Case 25/62 Plaumann Case 25/62 Plaumann & Co. v Commission [1963] ECR 95 Facts: A German importer from non-EU countries challenged a Commission decision addressed to the German Government refusing authorisation to partially suspend the collection of customs duties. The Commission argued that non-addressee individuals could not bring an action for annulment. Held: The action for annulment was…
  • Case 25/62 Plaumann In Case 25/62 PLAUMANN & Co., Hamburg, represented by Harald Dirges, advocate of the Cologne Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Mr Audry, Federation des Commerçants, 8 Avenue de l'Arsenal, applicant, v COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by Hubert Ehring, Legal Adviser to the European Executives, acting as…
  • Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos [1963] Facts: The appellant in this case was required to pay an import duty for the import of chemicals from Germany. Contrary to Art. 30 TFEU, the duty had increased. Held: The Treaty provisions had direct effect on Member States. The ECJ considered that ‘the Community constitutes a new…
1 2 3 4 5 6 15