Download Content

• Case 25/62 Plaumann
  In Case 25/62 PLAUMANN & Co., Hamburg, represented by Harald Dirges, advocate of the Cologne Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Mr Audry, Federation des Commerçants, 8 Avenue de l'Arsenal, applicant, v COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by Hubert Ehring, Legal Adviser to the European Executives, acting as…Case 25/62 Plaumann
• Case 31 and 33/62 Lutticke
  In Joined Cases 31/62-MILCHWERKE HEINZ WÖHRMANN & SOHN KG, Wesel/Rhein, 33/62- ALFONS LÜTTICKE GMBH, Germinghausen/Westphalia, represented by Fritz Modest, Artur Heemann, Renate Menssen, Jürgen Gündisch, Heinz Binder, advocates of the Hamburg Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Felicien Jansen, huissier, 21 rue Aldringer, applicants, v COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN…Case 31 and 33/62 Lutticke
• Case 90-91/63 Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium
  In Joined Cases 90 and 91/63 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by Georges Le Tallec, Legal Adviser of the European Executives, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Henri Manzanares, Secretary of the Legal Department of the European Executives, 2 place de Metz, Luxembourg, applicant, v GRAND…Case 90-91/63 Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium
• Case 5/71 Schöppenstedt
  In Case 5/71 AKTIEN-ZUCKERFABRIK SCHÖPPENSTEDT, Schöppenstedt (Lower Saxony), represented by Rudolf Schrader, Chairman, and Alfred Isensee, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, assisted by Arved Deringer, Oaus Tessin, Hansjürgen Herrmann and Jochim Sedemund, Advocates, of the Cologne Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Marc Baden, Advocate, 1 boulevard Prince-Henri,…Case 5/71 Schöppenstedt
• Case 13/83 Parliament v Council (Common Transport Policy)
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 May 1985 In Case 13/83 European Parliament, represented by F. Pasetti-Bombardella, Director-General in its General Secretariat, by its Legal Adviser, R. Bieber, and by J. Schoo, an administrator in its General Secretariat, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Schwarze, Professor at the University of Hamburg, and F. Jacobs, Barrister in…Case 13/83 Parliament v Council (Common Transport Policy)
• Case 302/87 Parliament v Council (Comitology)
  In Case 302/87 European Parliament, represented by F. Pasetti Bombardella, Jurisconsult of the Parliament, assisted by C. Pennera and J. Schoo, members of the Parliament's Legal Department, acting as Agents, with an address for service at the Secretariat­ General of the European Parliament, Kirchberg, Luxembourg, applicant, v Council of the European [Union], represented by A.…Case 302/87 Parliament v Council (Comitology)
• Case 309/89 Codorniu
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 18 May 1994 In Case C-309/89, Codorniu SA, a company incorporated under Spanish law, whose registered office is in San Sadurni de Noya (Spain), represented by Enric Picanol, Antonio Creus, Concepcion Fernandez and Mercedes Janssen, of the Barcelona Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Arendt…Case 309/89 Codorniu
• Case C-352/98P Bergaderm
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 July 2000 In Case C-352/98 P, Laboratoires Pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA, in liquidation, established at Rungis, France, and Jean-Jacques Goupil, residing at Chevreuse, France, represented by J.-P. Spitzer and Y-M. Moray, of the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of A. May, 398 Route d'Esch,…Case C-352/98P Bergaderm
• Case C-50/00P UPA
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 25 July 2002 In Case C-50/00 P, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores, having its registered office in Madrid (Spain), represented by J. Ledesma Bartret and J. Jimenez Laiglesia y de Oñate, Abogados, with an address for service in Luxembourg, appellant, APPEAL against the order of the [General Court] (Third Chamber) of 23…Case C-50/00P UPA
• Case C-402/05P Kadi (pp1–24)
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 3 September 2008 (Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban – United Nations – Security Council – Resolutions adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations – Implementation…Case C-402/05P Kadi (pp1–24)
• Case C-402/05P Kadi (pp25–48)
  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 3 September 2008 (Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban – United Nations – Security Council – Resolutions adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations – Implementation…Case C-402/05P Kadi (pp25–48)
• Case T-18/10 Inuit I
  ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) 6 September 2011 (Actions for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 – Trade in seal products – Ban on import and sale – Exception in favour of Inuit communities – Application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Meaning of ‘regulatory act’ – Absence…Case T-18/10 Inuit I
• Case C-583/11 P Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami
  Case C-583/11 P Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami v Parliament and Council [2013] Facts: An association of Inuit hunters and trappers of seals, supported by several businesses processing and selling seal products, sought to challenge a Regulation which had been adopted by the European Parliament and Council preventing imports into the EU of seal products on the…Short summary
• Case C-309/89 Codorníu
  Case C-309/89 Codorníu v Council of the European Union [1994] ECR I-01853 Facts: A Council regulation reserved the use of the word ‘crémant’ for sparkling wines manufactured in France or Luxembourg. A Spanish manufacturer holding that trademark challenged the regulation. The Council argued the manufacturer could not be individually concerned as they were simply a…Short summary
• Case 294/83 Parti écologiste "Les Verts"
  Case 294/83 Parti écologiste "Les Verts" v European Parliament [1986] ECR 1339 Facts: The applicants had formed a new political party (Les Verts – Parti Ecologiste). The applicants contended that a decision of the European Parliament to provide funds for election preparation only to parties already sitting in Parliament was illegal. Held: The applicants had…Short summary
• Case 60/81 International Business Machines (IBM) v Commission
  Case 60/81 International Business Machines (IBM) v Commission [1981] ECR 2639 Facts: The applicant wanted a Commission letter notifying it of competition proceedings against it annulled. The letter included a statement of objections which purported to require a response within a specified time frame. The Commission argued that the letter was not challengeable under Art.…Short summary
• Case C-50/00 Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (UPA)
  Case C-50/00 Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (UPA) v Council [2002] ECR I-6677 Facts: An association of farmers sought to annul a Regulation amending the common organisation of the olive oil market. The Court of First Instance decided that the members were not individually concerned by as they were in the same situation as any other…Short summary
• Case 26/76 Metro SB-Großmärkte
  Case 26/76 Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities [1977] ECR 1875 Facts: The applicant contended that a selective distribution scheme operated by SABA fell afoul of Art. 101 TFEU. SABA had stringent requirements for undertakings to meet in order to be classified as wholesalers, and the applicant did not…Short summary
• Case 25/62 Plaumann
  Case 25/62 Plaumann & Co. v Commission [1963] ECR 95 Facts: A German importer from non-EU countries challenged a Commission decision addressed to the German Government refusing authorisation to partially suspend the collection of customs duties. The Commission argued that non-addressee individuals could not bring an action for annulment. Held: The action for annulment was…Short summary
• Case 11/82 Piraiki-Patraiki
  Case 11/82 Piraiki-Patraiki and others v Commission of the European Communities [1985] ECR 207 Facts: The Commission had addressed a decision to France, allowing France to impose restrictions on the importation of cotton from Greece. At the time, some exporters in Greece had contracts pending. Exporters with pending contracts and exporters without pending contracts both…Short summary