Part III European Law: Substance

9. Internal Market: Goods  

Cases

Download Content

  • Case 7/68 Commission v Italy (Art Treasures)
    In Case 7/68 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by its Legal Adviser, Armando Toledano, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of its Legal Adviser, Emile Reuter, 4 boulevard Royal, applicant, and ITALIAN REPUBLIC, represented by Adolfo Maresca, Minister plenipotentiary, acting as Agent, assisted by Pietro Peronaci, Deputy…Case 7/68 Commission v Italy (Art Treasures)
  • Case 24/68 Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy)
    In Case 24/68 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by Sandro Gaudenzi, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Emile Reuter, its Legal Adviser, 4 boulevard Royal, applicant, v ITALIAN REPUBLIC, represented by Adolfo Maresca, Minister Plenipotentiary acting as Agent, assisted by Pierro Peronaci, assistant to the Avvocato…Case 24/68 Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy)
  • Case 8/74 Dassonville
    In Case 8/74 Reference to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Tribunal de Premiere Instance of Brussels for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that court between PROCUREUR DU ROI (Public Prosecutor) and BENOIT AND GUSTAVE DASSONVILLE and in the civil action between SA ETS. FOURCROY SA BREUVAL ET CIE…Case 8/74 Dassonville
  • Case 120/78 Cassis de Dijon
    In Case 120/78 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Hessisches Finanzgericht for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between REWE-ZENTRAL AG, having its registered office in Cologne, and BUNDESMONOPOLVERWALTUNG FÜR BRANNTWEIN (Federal Monopoly Administration for Spirits), on the interpretation of [Articles 34 and 37 TFEU] in relation…Case 120/78 Cassis de Dijon
  • Case 170/78 Commission v United Kingdom (Beer & Wine)
    In Case 170/78 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN [UNION], represented by its Legal Adviser, Anthony McClellan, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Oreste Montalto, a member of its Legal Department, Jean Monnet Building, Kirchberg, applicant, supported by the ITALIAN REPUBLIC, represented by Arnaldo Squillante, President of Section at…Case 170/78 Commission v United Kingdom (Beer & Wine)
  • Case 15/79 Groenveld
    In Case 15/79, REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven [administrative court of last instance in matters of trade and industry], The Hague, between P. B. GROENVELD B.V., Haarlem, and PRODUKTSCHAP VOOR VEE EN VLEES [Cattle and Meat Board], Rijswijk, on the interpretation of [Article 35…Case 15/79 Groenveld
  • Case 34/79 Henn and Darby
    In Case 34/79 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the House of Lords for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before them between REGINA and MAURICE DONALD HENN AND JOHN FREDERICK ERNEST DARBY on the interpretation of [Articles 34 TFEU] and 36 [TFEU], bearing in mind the national and conventional provisions…Case 34/79 Henn and Darby
  • Case 112/84 Humblot
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 9 May 1985 In Case 112/84 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Tribunal de grande instance [Regional Court], Belfort, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Michel Humblot and Directeur des services fiscaux on the interpretation of [Article 110 TFEU],Case 112/84 Humblot
  • Case 178/84 Commission v Germany (Beer Purity)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 12 March 1987 In Case 178/84 Commission of the European [Union], represented by R. C. Beraud, Principal Legal Adviser, and J. Sack, a member of its Legal Department, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of G. Kremlis, also a member of the Commission's Legal Department, Jean Mon…Case 178/84 Commission v Germany (Beer Purity)
  • Case 196/85 Commission v France (Natural Sweet Wines)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 7 April 1987 In Case 196/85 Commission of the European [Union], represented by its Legal Adviser, Johannes Føns Buhl, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Georges Kremlis, a member of its Legal Department, Jean Monnet Building, Kirchberg, applicant, v French Republic, represented by…Case 196/85 Commission v France (Natural Sweet Wines)
  • Case 145/88 Torfaen
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 November 1989 In Case C-145/88 REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by Cwmbran Magistrates' Court, United Kingdom, for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between Torfaen Borough Council and B & Q plc (formerly B & Q (Retail) Limited), Gwent, on the…Case 145/88 Torfaen
  • Cases C-267 and 268/91 Keck
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 24 November 1993 In Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91, REFERENCE to the Court under [Article 267 TFEU] by the Tribunal de Grande Instance (Regional Court), Strasbourg (France), for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that court against Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard, on the interpretation of the rules…Cases C-267 and 268/91 Keck
  • Case C-110/05 Commission v Italy (Italian Trailers)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 10 February 2009 (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – [Article 34 TFEU] – Concept of ‘measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports’ – Prohibition on mopeds, motorcycles, motor tricycles and quadricycles towing a trailer in the territory of a Member State – Road safety…Case C-110/05 Commission v Italy (Italian Trailers)
  • Case C-142/05 Mickelson
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 4 June 2009 (Directive 94/25/EC – Approximation of laws – Recreational craft – Prohibition of using personal watercraft on waters other than general navigable waterways – [Articles 34 and 36 TFEU] – Measures having equivalent effect – Access to the market – Impediment – Protection of the environment –…Case C-142/05 Mickelson
  • Case C-205/07 Gybrechts
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 December 2008 ([Articles 34 to 36 TFEU] – Directive 97/7/EC – Consumer protection in distance contracts – Period for withdrawal – Prohibition on requiring from a consumer a deposit or payment before the end of the period for withdrawal) In Case C 205/07, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling…Case C-205/07 Gybrechts